Last week I finally started using basic expectancy formula. I found that at the end of each session my system had a positive expectancy.
During one session I experienced nine (9) consecutive drawdowns and still made money with the next three trades.
Each day during the week I watched the Major Averages harder.
I learned that the reason I had my nine (9) consecutive drawdowns was that I was going contra on a trend day.
At least now I know what a trend day looks like! It is not rocket science.
So I have learned the very important lesson of context. I believe on one of the CBOT tutorials they said you shouldn’t take contra strategies when the market is trending.
Sounds simple, so why did it take me so long?
Because there’s so much information out there and I don’t have a mentor and I don’t trust anyone pitching seminars or trader ‘education’.
Anyway, I have a setup and I am now starting to learn how to wait for it. To come to this simple point also took me two (2) years!
I have been reviewing trading sites and a lot about stops. The sin of moving a stop to allow the stock ‘more room to breathe’.
Last time I had a big trading loss it was because I kept moving my stop, just ‘hoping’ the trade would go my way. Classic mistake.
After that, I decided to go on the simulator and finally record my expectancy. Smartest thing I ever did in my trading career.
It all ties together. Because I know my expectancy is positive, I know I don’t have to ‘adjust my stops’ to make money for the day’s work. I know that since I am now profitable, my stops are okay for now. Let the trade go against me and take out the stop. Who cares. After all, I have seen days of nine (9) losses in a row and know that if I take the stops I can still post a profit at the end of the day (given there are enough opportunities).
Gee that’s very interesting. I was just looking at a website where they are hiring traders. They actually have it specified what the max position size is for traders at every level from “associate” to “elite”. The first level you are limited to 500 share lots and the second level you are limited to 700 share lots.
I am trading between 500 and 1000 share lots which puts me in the first half of their traders. I try to take a position size so I don’t have to use margin.
Anyway, I think my most important thought is this: it is easy to say “stick to your stops”. Sticking to your stops, I believe, goes hand in hand with confidence level. If you have no confidence you fear that you will lose another trade and will be a failure. If you have confidence, you know that probability favors you will meet your expectancy number. You know that you are a profitable trader. You know that you can take nine (9) drawdowns in a row.
You have to trade day in and day out, even if only on a simulator. Someone told me recently: “A simulator — you can learn to fly a 747 on one”. There doesn’t seem to be enough on the web about trading in simulation to develop a system. There’s so much more on ‘backtesting’. Even the ad on tv says “backtest, backtest, backets’. I think it’s another lie.
I finally read tonight: intraday traders rely more on patterns than they do on indicators. Aha! i JUST knew it!
So confidence is one article and keeping your stops are another article. Now look at the correlation of confidence to one’s ability to keep stops.
The vix is one article and wait for the best setup is another article. Now combine the two — make the vix part of your setup.
You better use more than one timeframe is one article and just how to do that is another and don’t mix your timeframes is another one. Now realize there are players in each timeframe. Realize prices on one timeframe can ’swell up’ and affect a shorter timeframe.
Tell me about confluence, sure, but why not tell me “confluence of indicators, of Eastern and Western analysis methods, works because you are riding with ‘multiple herds’. There’s a ‘herd’ in each timeframe. I bet there’s a five-minute candle herd, a daily candle herd, and a 15-minute herd. When you leverage multiple timeframe analysis, what you are doing is becoming a member of each ‘herd’. Why not tell me that?
I’m re-reading my trading books, and starting with a Velez and Capra classic. There’s a lot of good stuff in the beginning chapters that I missed on the first read.
I hate it that they say 95% of traders fail. I believe the main reason is that novices can’t stand losing a trade. They don’t minimize their losses. But the books need to write more about why. It is because they don’t have a winning system yet — therefore they don’t have confidence. Therefore they don’t have confidence that the next trade could easily make up for many losses. The beginning books don’t emphasize enough the need to wait for setups. The beginning books don’t emphasize enough how to find a setup.
It’s all intertwined. If you don’t wait for a setup, you may try to scalp for a few pennies. If you are doing that, I truly believe you are competing with black-box trading and you will not win.
The beginning books should teach you how to find good setups. I knew a lot about technical analysis but could never find a textbook setup.